Integration Architecture Comparison
The following table compares process integration architecture. Generation 1 is system-based and is sold as an over-night intervention; Generation 2 is people-based and brought about by well planned management of change.
GENERATION 1: Coercive characterized by large systems installations, i.e. “My way or the highway”… |
GENERATION 2: Permissive characterized by respect of those working in the organization and how they do things… |
• a complete system, free standing |
• made up of the software that people in the organization are currently using |
• forces behaviors of users |
• adapts to user behavior |
• human interaction continues to be an afterthought |
• human interaction drives the integration of system: what people do is actually the system |
• oriented towards past use and data |
• oriented towards future use and information |
• limited to system capability |
• limited only by size and scope of data warehouse: infinitely extensible |
• builds on unsustainable infrastructure: systems gurus control the applications |
• builds on multi-stakeholder infrastructure: people become the systems gurus |
• characterized by the establishment of a large integrating software application costing millions of dollars to install and operate |
• characterized by coordinating the integration of small, user friendly applications |
- Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.
- Press the space key then arrow keys to make a selection.